AZ Supreme Court rules illegally obtained DNA evidence would have been discovered eventually
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that, even though police violated a murder suspect’s constitutional rights by analyzing his stored blood sample without a warrant, the DNA evidence can still be used against him because of an exception in search and seizure law.
Arizona Supreme Court allows disputed DNA evidence in decade-old Scottsdale murder case
The Arizona Supreme Court says police violated constitutional protections against illegal searches when they analyzed blood from a DUI arrest for a separate murder investigation. But the high court also says DNA evidence can still be heard by a jury because the final outcome of the DUI case requires the state to collect it.
President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to be the government’s top lawyer before the Supreme Court burst on the national scene ...
11hon MSN
A failure by state officials to document the citizenship status of thousands of voters was identified as “a problem” seven ...
The Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments chose the five nominees after a long day of interviews and about 90 ...
Judge Pamela S. Gates is named the Presiding Judge for Maricopa County's Superior Court starting July 1, 2025.
But she said the dues in Arizona already are “one of the highest in the nation ... “Appeasing bullies is cowardly and is ...
A man is sleeping on the ground next to a bus stop wrapped in a blanket when he is spotted by a police officer. A City of Las ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback