Regent did not offer 60-day WARN Act notices or pay to employees who worked remotely, according to the suit. Regent’s lawyers ...

"Defendant Regent made the calculated decision, in consultation with its lawyers, that it could save money because of an ...

it provided notices under the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 (the WARN Act) only to those employees working in-person, the suit claims.

Four former Zulily employees allege the company did not provide remote workers with enough notice of layoffs, violating ...

it provided notices under the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 (the WARN Act) only to those employees working in-person, the suit claims. But Regent’s management ...

A Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN) notice filed with the department shows the Radian Group Inc. in ...

centers on whether Zulily's former private equity parent company Regent complied with the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 while conducting mass layoffs last year.

In addition to the laws forbidding discrimination, the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 and the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act protect workers by dictating the terms ...

an executive in the bank’s Displacements Advisory Group wrote the state in a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act or WARN letter. Frazier said more specific information on job ...

A Sacramento County-based construction company that manufactures large-scale solar panel projects plans to lay off 165 ...

The mass layoffs at the mine’s East Boulder and Stillwater operations comprise roughly 40% of the company’s Montana mining ...