statutory remedy under Section 34 of the Act. 12. In view of the above, we allow the appeals, set aside the judgment and order passed by the High Court in FAO Nos. 800/2013(O&M), 2000/2015(O&M), ...

(ii) In view of the fact that the entry No. 64 was passed on the basis of oral sale, whether the Courts below have erred in holding that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to decide the legality or ...

I am in the agreement with the view taken by the Allahabad High Court. In these circumstances, it was permissible for the Special Court to determine the civil liability and it was not necessary for ...

i. The NHAI shall deposit 50 per cent of the compensation amount, as awarded by the Arbitral Court, with the Executing Court within a period of four weeks. The said amount shall be released to the ...

Learned counsel for appellants would submit that, whatever allegations are made about demand, is not illegal demand towards any dowry. According to him, demand was towards customary rituals which are ...

The Karnataka High Court upheld a trial court order discharging a public servant of graft charges under the Prevention of ...

In a recent decision in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Permission as sought for is granted. List the matter before this Bench on 08.01.2024 ...

The Act is a piece of Civil Code which is applicable to every woman in India irrespective of her religious affiliation and/or social background for a more effective protection of her rights guaranteed ...

33. Under the circumstances, and for the reasons supra, the arrest of the petitioners is held to be illegal for breach of mandatory provision under Section 41A Cr.P.C. CORAM : ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, & N.

Section 376D and Section 342 of the Indian Penal Code. The Nachna, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan. District and Sessions Judge, Pokaran (Jaisalmer). 7. The prosecution has examined one witness so far.

This matter was called on for hearing today. Mr. Abhikalp Pratap Singh. 8. With the above order, I.A. No.208763/2024 stands disposed of.