The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

An analysis found that about 40% of over 1,000 randomly selected Wikipedia articles contain outdated or incorrect information ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information.

Newspapers have offered puzzles in some capacity for as long as anyone can remember, with crosswords being the most renowned. But when TheNew York Times bought Wordle at the start of 2022, things ...

Wikipedia halts its AI summary rollout after human editors raise concerns about credibility. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries ...

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has warned that the website can no longer be trusted — insisting it is now just “propaganda” for the left-leaning “establishment.” Sanger told UnHerd ...

Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia's credibility.

According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select articles in ...

“Only 17 percent of biographies on Wikipedia are about women. Help us change that!” read the event description on meetup.com. Answering the clarion call, a group of strangers gathered inside ...

English Wikipedia raked in more than 84 billion views this year, according to numbers released Tuesday by the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit behind the free, publicly edited online encyclopedia.